True Artists Video Art Design
Smart Public Relations Services by La CoffeeMelodie Suite
We create great impression for you,
both for PR work and personal keepsake!
If you want an audience the responsibility for finding it is squarely on you.
Until you reach a certain level of notoriety you shouldn't expect your excellence
alone to draw people. There are, for example, great shower singers in the world,
but no one knows of them: and that's all they'll ever do.
On the one hand I suppose some really don't care- at a certain level people do things solely for themselves.
Great art and artistry, though, should be shared, and most everyone in one way or another does seek some
external validation of his work.
Don't sacrifice your integrity, but put yourself "out there." If that means attending or putting up your own concerts,
singing in local choirs, or creating and distributing publicity materials then do it. Enlist the help of experts,
if you like, in order to make an even more positive impression on your future fans. So may artists are unable to
undertake these "down-to-earth" tasks, but they are absolutely essential for those who want to make their marks.
The simple fact is that you must be in the public eye. Unfortunately, many feel that this is a Catch-22 of sorts:
I'm not "out there" because no one knows me, and no one knows me because I'm not "out there." If this is how you think,
though, you're just being weeded out and those better suited to survival- those who take the initiative- will pass you by.
No one said an artist's job is easy. Unlike so many others his output is not easily quantifiable: there is no true and
objective standard by which his work can be judged, and so often great performers are passed over for no apparent reason.
So what is an artist to do?
How does he show potential audiences that he is worthy
of their attention?
Who's the "better" violinist, Jascha Heifetz or Joshua Bell?
Who's the "better" singer, Luciano Pavarotti or Franco Corelli?
Who's the "better" artist, Pablo Picasso or Vincent van Gogh? Who is the "greater" composer, Mozart or Bach?
The questions are almost nonsensical, for while there are certain objectives that each of these strives toward,
what makes each of these an "artist" is his individuality- his uniqueness- as well as the sensibilities of the audience.
It's a very interesting discussion to compare their different qualities, but pretty much pointless to say that one
is "better" than another.
In the business world, though, all that matters is the "bottom line." Athletes, too, are evaluated objectively: a .300 batting
average is better than .260, a birdie is better than a bogey, and if you score fifteen touchdowns in a season it's better than
scoring only four. Of course, an athlete's worth is predicated on more than just statistics, but they nevertheless play a large part.
You want a doctor who saves a large percentage of his patients, an airline pilot who's never had a crash,
a bank that pays more interest on your savings. These are all measurable facts and subject to inevitable,
and often justifiable, comparisons.
Now, I suppose we can often come to a general consensus that a given artist is good or bad too, but even then
it is difficult to explain exactly why. They certainly don't use the tool of objective comparison in highlighting
their strengths. A singer doesn't say, "I crack a smaller percentage of my high Cs than 90% of all working tenors,"
and a cellist doesn't say "My tone is 55% fuller than 98% of all working cellists today." Even if these statistics
were somehow available and accurate it probably wouldn't even matter: we don't value our art and artists this way.
Artists are really at the mercy of the subjectivity of their own endeavors.
What this means is that, as an artist, you can't rely on your ability alone to carry you out to the world:
you have to advertise yourself in as many positive ways as possible.